|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 13:13:28 GMT -8
If he takes the hit his potential needs to be restored. He went 2 tcs where his potential was used on going B- to B+.
I moved him there expecting a hit, not expecting his potential to be used on rebounding just to be taken away. And it also needs to be done to every single player moved to SG that’s still active.
|
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jun 1, 2023 13:14:55 GMT -8
Do stats even suck up potential like that? Rebounding would just be capped
|
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 13:15:59 GMT -8
I rather move him to SF than waste all of that improvement
|
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 13:17:33 GMT -8
I’m not even playing him at SG lol
|
|
Go Niners
Wait List
Wait List
Niners!
Posts: 35,751 
|
Post by Go Niners on Jun 1, 2023 13:18:14 GMT -8
I think Dino dropped but went right back up after tc no, if you are at SG, and 60 or below, you cannot improve above it. If you are above it already though, it will let you go up and down. So since he is over 60, he can go above in a future TC even if he goes under in the next TC? He broke the position? Kinda wish I moved Kareem to SF as a rookie, camped his handles and then moved him back before TC |
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jun 1, 2023 13:18:38 GMT -8
I’m not even playing him at SG lol then make him Sf solves everything |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 13:27:10 GMT -8
I’m not even playing him at SG lol then make him Sf solves everything How about every other player that was moved to SG but not edited… |
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jun 1, 2023 13:45:07 GMT -8
Why are we complaining about Dino now though
|
|
|
|
Post by chipper on Jun 1, 2023 13:53:03 GMT -8
Why are we complaining about Dino now though Because this league likes to bitch and moan about EVERYTHING We should be focusing on Heat vs Nuggets instead |
|
|
|
Post by Losanglife on Jun 1, 2023 14:29:05 GMT -8
dino shoulda been "fixed" a while ago..too late now
|
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jun 1, 2023 14:41:58 GMT -8
then make him Sf solves everything How about every other player that was moved to SG but not edited… would be needing a fix for sure. What’s the point of the rule lol |
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jun 1, 2023 15:09:52 GMT -8
Why are we complaining about Dino now though People have been complaining since TC |
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jun 1, 2023 15:11:56 GMT -8
Why are we complaining about Dino now though Because this league likes to bitch and moan about EVERYTHING We should be focusing on Heat vs Nuggets instead Lol... This is a legitimate complaint. Dino at B+ rebs at SG breaks a league rule. |
|
|
|
Post by autumn harold on Jun 1, 2023 15:12:34 GMT -8
It doesn’t break a rule though
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn harold on Jun 1, 2023 15:13:13 GMT -8
To start at SG you must either be listed at SG or have a MAX of C+ rebounding. If the player has a rebounding grade of B- or higher and is not listed as a SG he cannot start at SG.
|
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jun 1, 2023 15:13:20 GMT -8
dino shoulda been "fixed" a while ago..too late now Why is it too late? He just got to B+ this season.. a week ago in real time |
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jun 1, 2023 15:15:07 GMT -8
To start at SG you must either be listed at SG or have a MAX of C+ rebounding. If the player has a rebounding grade of B- or higher and is not listed as a SG he cannot start at SG. Are we really going to do this... The whole point of mandating the move to SG is to limit the rebs. Seems pretty clear from Brophs posts that Spence missed something in the move here |
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jun 1, 2023 15:16:49 GMT -8
Just let me know what we are doing here. I wouldn't mind moving Bingo to SG
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn harold on Jun 1, 2023 15:18:33 GMT -8
Pretty clear what’s being done and you can move bingo to sg. Spence will prob change how he implements sg moves in the offseason but right now it’s not affecting rebounding grades
|
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Jun 1, 2023 15:25:35 GMT -8
I moved him there expecting a hit And there was none. So why are we against a hit when one didn't and hasn't occurred? I get it. Sucks but I feel like people keep looking at things as a "how I get screwed" and not for the league itself. The SG rule is supposed to stop people from playing B rebs and above at SG isn't it? Most of us were there in that thread. Stop playing the semantics game. If you want a middle ground, let him stay as is till the end of the year. Then either move him to SF or open the page. |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 17:56:38 GMT -8
I moved him there expecting a hit And there was none. So why are we against a hit when one didn't and hasn't occurred? I get it. Sucks but I feel like people keep looking at things as a "how I get screwed" and not for the league itself. The SG rule is supposed to stop people from playing B rebs and above at SG isn't it? Most of us were there in that thread. Stop playing the semantics game. If you want a middle ground, let him stay as is till the end of the year. Then either move him to SF or open the page. You serious ? I mentioned it 100 times…. I expected the hit… then he went thru 2 tcs where he used his potential on rebounding to go from b- to b+…. Would you want one of your players to get his ratings decreased after 2 tcs for something you had no idea about ? When during that same time, had he been capped, his potential could have been going to other categories? It’s not semantics so gtfo. I’ll move him and I don’t care, but acting like you care about the league while just picking on 1 player where there are many others that have this same scenario it’s ridiculous. Don’t mis quote me and cut my sentences short to prove your point…. Taking what I said out of context. |
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Jun 1, 2023 18:29:27 GMT -8
And there was none. So why are we against a hit when one didn't and hasn't occurred? I get it. Sucks but I feel like people keep looking at things as a "how I get screwed" and not for the league itself. The SG rule is supposed to stop people from playing B rebs and above at SG isn't it? Most of us were there in that thread. Stop playing the semantics game. If you want a middle ground, let him stay as is till the end of the year. Then either move him to SF or open the page. You serious ? I mentioned it 100 times…. I expected the hit… then he went thru 2 tcs where he used his potential on rebounding to go from b- to b+…. Would you want one of your players to get his ratings decreased after 2 tcs for something you had no idea about ? When during that same time, had he been capped, his potential could have been going to other categories? It’s not semantics so gtfo. I’ll move him and I don’t care, but acting like you care about the league while just picking on 1 player where there are many others that have this same scenario it’s ridiculous. Don’t mis quote me and cut my sentences short to prove your point…. Taking what I said out of context. It's not a misquote nor out of context. I literally took what you said and addressed that. I don't care if you said it 100 times. I get it. It sucks to see his ratings decrease which is why I said to do it in he offseason with your choice of keep him at SF or take the limit that was supposed to happen originally to keep him at SG. He literally has an "unfair advantage" as deemed by a rule. Or just remove the SG rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 19:25:08 GMT -8
You serious ? I mentioned it 100 times…. I expected the hit… then he went thru 2 tcs where he used his potential on rebounding to go from b- to b+…. Would you want one of your players to get his ratings decreased after 2 tcs for something you had no idea about ? When during that same time, had he been capped, his potential could have been going to other categories? It’s not semantics so gtfo. I’ll move him and I don’t care, but acting like you care about the league while just picking on 1 player where there are many others that have this same scenario it’s ridiculous. Don’t mis quote me and cut my sentences short to prove your point…. Taking what I said out of context. It's not a misquote nor out of context. I literally took what you said and addressed that. I don't care if you said it 100 times. I get it. It sucks to see his ratings decrease which is why I said to do it in he offseason with your choice of keep him at SF or take the limit that was supposed to happen originally to keep him at SG. He literally has an "unfair advantage" as deemed by a rule. Or just remove the SG rule. List out all players thst have been moved to SG that are currently active and I’ll move in right now. Let’s clean up this “ unfair advantage “ from the league youre so concerned with . And yes it’s out of context, |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Jun 1, 2023 19:35:55 GMT -8
Im not even playing him at the 2 so I don’t care if that’s what Spence asks me to do… that fact that you are more concerned about the “rule “ when it’s clearly just about Dino is something
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jun 1, 2023 19:50:11 GMT -8
Im not even playing him at the 2 so I don’t care if that’s what Spence asks me to do… that fact that you are more concerned about the “rule “ when it’s clearly just about Dino is something Dino is the only player in the league at sg level that cannot have the rebounding rating he has if player pages are open |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jun 1, 2023 19:50:40 GMT -8
So it being only about Dino is kinda the point
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jun 1, 2023 19:55:48 GMT -8
I might have missed somebody, but the only person I saw at sg with more than c+ is George Gervin at B-
|
|
Go Niners
Wait List
Wait List
Niners!
Posts: 35,751
|
Post by Go Niners on Jun 1, 2023 20:00:21 GMT -8
I might have missed somebody, but the only person I saw at sg with more than c+ is George Gervin at B- Watch him go up in TC and get “fixed.” hf won’t be happy. |
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Jun 1, 2023 20:05:31 GMT -8
Im not even playing him at the 2 so I don’t care if that’s what Spence asks me to do… that fact that you are more concerned about the “rule “ when it’s clearly just about Dino is something Dino is the only player that this has occurred with since the rule happening, hence why it's being brought up. People haven't wanted to move guys with high rebounding to SG because of the belief that the rebounding would drop. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 2, 2023 10:17:36 GMT -8
trade in
|
|
