Go Niners
Wait List
Wait List
Niners!
Posts: 35,751 
|
Post by Go Niners on Oct 9, 2023 2:31:23 GMT -8
Good rule tho
|
|
|
|
Post by stooolfan on Oct 9, 2023 7:26:09 GMT -8
Bummer can’t play my new dude at sf
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 12, 2023 5:54:48 GMT -8
Starting in 2070 anyone with B or more rebounding must also have B outside or B handles to start at SF, unless they were created s a SF. In the case they are made as a SF they must not be moved from SF. |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Oct 12, 2023 6:03:16 GMT -8
who is monitoring this lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 12, 2023 6:31:52 GMT -8
No one! Honor code!
|
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Oct 12, 2023 6:33:09 GMT -8
LMAO in this economy?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 12, 2023 6:33:36 GMT -8
It wont end well!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:10:45 GMT -8
It’s still really dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:11:35 GMT -8
If you are gonna keep having a rebounding pgs and sfs, why take this one away, all you do is force one style of play
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:12:24 GMT -8
The no shooting sfs are not better then ones with shooting, they get torched from the perimeter with no perimeter d, you play them to cover rebounding
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:13:32 GMT -8
And now we can’t move sfs, even better
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:15:49 GMT -8
This rule is so fucking dumb James worthy is not eligible to play sf in 2070
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Oct 13, 2023 5:20:12 GMT -8
No more PGs with higher than C rebounding should be a thing too
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Oct 13, 2023 5:21:37 GMT -8
Worthy was a SF, not sure why Spence would have him at PF.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:25:10 GMT -8
The reason to limit pg and sg is because players at those positions have natural rebounding limits they can’t overcome. Letting players play there with A rebounding makes natural sg less useful because they can’t get to the same spot.
Sf has no such limitation and so any player can have any rating there, pf is limited in perimeter d and handles, same with c, but an sf can and does develop rebounding. C rebounding SFs aren’t gonna suddenly become useful because one big isn’t playing sf, the big scoring rebounding ones preclude that possibility already, but it lets teams try to at least cover the rebounding aspect, though sacrificing defense and offense, just in general sacrificing defense and offense to grab boards to help cover a suspect rebounding shot blocker. This rule really is all the negatives of the sg stuff without any positives. So cc wants to play Hakeem at sf, oh well he is throwing away offense and defense, it’s not smart
|
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Oct 13, 2023 5:55:48 GMT -8
This rule is so fucking dumb James worthy is not eligible to play sf in 2070 isn’t he already listed there/ drafted there (idr) |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 5:56:17 GMT -8
This rule is so fucking dumb James worthy is not eligible to play sf in 2070 isn’t he already listed there/ drafted there (idr) He came in as a pf |
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on Oct 13, 2023 6:03:36 GMT -8
Change can be good
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 13, 2023 6:47:28 GMT -8
I want some type of rule tho. Ill think more on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn harold on Oct 13, 2023 6:49:05 GMT -8
I want some type of rule tho. Ill think more on it. why not do this if they come in at PF or C, they can't play SF unless you say in the notes that they can. that will let you make guys like Leo Gray or Worthy SF eligible while generally preventing bigs from being SFs |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 6:52:48 GMT -8
I want some type of rule tho. Ill think more on it. why not do this if they come in at PF or C, they can't play SF unless you say in the notes that they can. that will let you make guys like Leo Gray or Worthy SF eligible while generally preventing bigs from being SFs That would preclude making draft steals like those guys though. Or keeping notes separate to the visible ones in case asked. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 6:53:27 GMT -8
the better way is the opposite, just call out guys that CANT play SF
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 13, 2023 7:11:56 GMT -8
What if we eliminate position changes and you can only start where youre made.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Oct 13, 2023 7:14:15 GMT -8
if we restart that would be a good rule
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 8:00:10 GMT -8
if we restart that would be a good rule |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 9:10:00 GMT -8
it does put quite the onus on you though, would be rough to make like 40 starting C and 10 starting PF accidentally
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 9:11:36 GMT -8
but again, the impact of bigs at Sf is not great, its a patchwork, the elite Moses type bigs are better off at C or PF, where the defense plays a huge role. The only place I could see it being annoying is if somebody had Moses, Laimbeer, Hakeem and put one at SF...but then, you would still just rather have Bird at SF.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 9:12:56 GMT -8
If somebody has an Adrian Griffin, Larry Bird, and a Moses...they arent starting Moses at SF and Larry/Griffin at PF...its only when they dont have one this happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Oct 13, 2023 9:14:04 GMT -8
If somebody has an Adrian Griffin, Larry Bird, and a Moses...they arent starting Moses at SF and Larry/Griffin at PF...its only when they dont have one this happens. Way people are here yes they will lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 13, 2023 9:27:38 GMT -8
If somebody has an Adrian Griffin, Larry Bird, and a Moses...they arent starting Moses at SF and Larry/Griffin at PF...its only when they dont have one this happens. Way people are here yes they will lol. my point was they wont because its worse |
|
