|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:56:19 GMT -8
and i was talking about what Balkman couldve been before he got +24 in to his scoring
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:56:46 GMT -8
lou/balkman started with better base ratings than the bigs last draft
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 8:56:48 GMT -8
i really wanna see where i said splitter would be better than amundson lol i was talking about lou and balkman so thought you included lou in your post as well but you just said all of them would be way better than balkman. which was also wrong since splitter is useless thank you for your integrity |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:56:55 GMT -8
which is dumb
|
|
Mark
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 7,336
|
Post by Mark on Aug 27, 2020 8:57:15 GMT -8
i really wanna see where i said splitter would be better than amundson lol you didn't lol Aug 14, 2020 at 4:22pm kobe said: i mean gasol looks cute or w/e but other than that.. splitter, horford, gasol, noah, oden are all gonna be way better than balkman And I said I'd deal Amundson for a top 5 big, which meant a big in the top 5. don't even blame kobe for that confusion. i thought i worded it clearly, because i think "top 5" as in top 5 picks, but i hadn't. so i confirmed what i meant like 5 minutes later this is idiotic lol |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 8:57:43 GMT -8
kobe just imagine you drafted or traded tim duncan for marc gasol. it could be worse
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:57:51 GMT -8
i really wanna see where i said splitter would be better than amundson lol you didn't lol Aug 14, 2020 at 4:22pm kobe said: i mean gasol looks cute or w/e but other than that.. splitter, horford, gasol, noah, oden are all gonna be way better than balkman And I said I'd deal Amundson for a top 5 big, which meant a big in the top 5. don't even blame kobe for that confusion. i thought i worded it clearly because i think "top 5" as in top 5 picks. so i confirmed what i meant like 5 minutes later this is idiotic lol why would lou for a top 5 pick even be something you post? yikes |
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Aug 27, 2020 8:57:53 GMT -8
Can I trade David Lee?
Lee for a pick or Lee/MM for exp.
|
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:03 GMT -8
Andre Iguodala SG 10 36.0 12.1 6.3 3.6 2.8 0.8 1.4 .293 .692 .102
Spencer’s biggest troll
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:24 GMT -8
you said top 5 bigs right after a list of the best 5 bigs in the draft were listed by your best friend soo
|
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:30 GMT -8
Also have Pollard, N'Daiye who can go.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:42 GMT -8
balkman is probably better than splitter. sorry i guess. he's nowhere near the other guys i mentioned though, so if you're comparing the best bigs from those drafts, i guess my point stands.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:43 GMT -8
a top 5 pick is a lot different than top 5 bigs
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevie B on Aug 27, 2020 8:58:44 GMT -8
Andre Iguodala SG 10 36.0 12.1 6.3 3.6 2.8 0.8 1.4 .293 .692 .102 Spencer’s biggest troll lol yea |
|
|
|
Post by Royal on Aug 27, 2020 8:59:03 GMT -8
If 76ers decide to go full tank than Hawks and Magic are locked in playoffs.
|
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Aug 27, 2020 8:59:16 GMT -8
Antonio Daniels can go for a matching expiring as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 8:59:19 GMT -8
id take balkman with the right camps over horford as well
|
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Aug 27, 2020 8:59:33 GMT -8
Have several GMs blocked now and it feels liberating.
|
|
Mark
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 7,336
|
Post by Mark on Aug 27, 2020 8:59:38 GMT -8
you didn't lol Aug 14, 2020 at 4:22pm kobe said: i mean gasol looks cute or w/e but other than that.. splitter, horford, gasol, noah, oden are all gonna be way better than balkman And I said I'd deal Amundson for a top 5 big, which meant a big in the top 5. don't even blame kobe for that confusion. i thought i worded it clearly because i think "top 5" as in top 5 picks. so i confirmed what i meant like 5 minutes later this is idiotic lol why would lou for a top 5 pick even be something you post? yikes because you had just spent 10 posts bitching that amundson would be the best big in the draft... and the top 5 in the draft was going to be a wing, a PG, and 3 bigs. I was saying if you actually think amundson is the best big in the draft, and you miss out on conley (or trade him, lulz) or KD, then take Amundson. I'd have preferred any of the leftover top 5 bigs to amundson. that's literally where it came from |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 9:00:24 GMT -8
id take balkman with the right camps over horford as well don't do this, it's not worth it |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:00:38 GMT -8
sorry i couldnt read your mind or know that you were trolling
|
|
Mark
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 7,336
|
Post by Mark on Aug 27, 2020 9:01:08 GMT -8
why would lou for a top 5 pick even be something you post? yikes because you had just spent 10 posts bitching that amundson would be the best big in the draft... and the top 5 in the draft was going to be a wing, a PG, and 3 bigs. I was saying if you actually think amundson is the best big in the draft, and you miss out on conley (or trade him, lulz) or KD, then take Amundson. I'd have preferred any of the leftover top 5 bigs to amundson. that's literally where it came from and i literally just did it again. top 5 bigs. because when i talk about the draft, top 5 to me means top 5 picks. didn't blame you for not realizing that, i said i was unclear. also explained this 500 times since. but you bitch about the sun coming up each morning so i don't know why i'm surprised you're still talking about this |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:01:39 GMT -8
id take balkman with the right camps over horford as well don't do this, it's not worth it andrew ruined balkman but he couldve been nice. horford sucks lol he looks and sims almost as bad as splitter |
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on Aug 27, 2020 9:02:09 GMT -8
Antonio Daniels can go for a matching expiring as well. Solid pg! |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:03:16 GMT -8
balkman should be A def B reb right now
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:03:47 GMT -8
splitter has no chance. sad
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:03:58 GMT -8
balkman still solid even after all his camps were wasted
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Aug 27, 2020 9:04:38 GMT -8
why is central division so bad meh thought pistons pick might be decent
|
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Aug 27, 2020 9:06:44 GMT -8
257 Antonio Daniels PG 10 19.2 9.9 1.0 3.6 1.1 0.1 1.9 .466 1.000 .429
He is free.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevie B on Aug 27, 2020 9:08:02 GMT -8
why is central division so bad meh thought pistons pick might be decent they had Gil, Wade, AK, and Z. That pick was never gunna be good unless injuries occurred |
|
