|
|
Post by Braz on Jan 31, 2021 9:35:21 GMT -8
We were talking pre pod and I suggested to Spencer that we can trade RC (bank cap 3) and AC (bank cap 2) My idea is this would be a perfect sweetener to trades, allow gms to be more active and allow the gms who do not write often camp their players and remain in the hunt. Couldn't hurt right? To put some proposed rigor around the proposal i think we should - Not be able to hold/bank 3 RC (9 points) 2 AC (10 points) - Likely should have earning cap Trade example Raptors send Billy walker 3 RC gm roundtable for Lou Williams open to feedback or suggestions but think this is a great way to balance out trades and increase activity. Lastly we would need a banker or moderator. Spencer said an AC a season if someone would want to do it. give feedback below and on poll |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 10:49:24 GMT -8
I think we need more explanation in specifics. Each GM would have an unspent bank of RCs/ACs. Those would be eligible for trade. Wed have perhaps a separate board where you can track these. I think wed need ashes and Lasagna and tears of failure for some help deciding whats possible and what isnt as far as tracking goes also. Theyd be listed in trades as assets like picks or players. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 10:49:57 GMT -8
I have some very specific concerns about organization. I mean people cant track and post trades correctly as is. This complicates that more.
|
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037 
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 10:51:44 GMT -8
I have some very specific concerns about organization. I mean people cant track and post trades correctly as is. This complicates that more. True also are you still only allowed to use 3 ACs as well i think that should stay. |
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jan 31, 2021 11:01:52 GMT -8
I have some very specific concerns about organization. I mean people cant track and post trades correctly as is. This complicates that more. True also are you still only allowed to use 3 ACs as well i think that should stay. I would say yes. Thanks for adding above Spencer. My main idea is it allows us to have an additional trade commodity which directly rewards for activity. |
|
ashes
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 36,162
|
Post by ashes on Jan 31, 2021 11:03:38 GMT -8
Like is someone actually going to enforce "banking" RCs/ACs with a cap? I've seen people use podcast ACs from forever ago. It's why we just settled on no more than using 3 a year.
Do your tradeable ACs count towards the 3 ACs per season limit?
Are you only trading RCs from articles, or we using ones earned through posts too?
Just gonna vote no on this.
|
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 11:04:34 GMT -8
Like is someone actually going to enforce "banking" RCs/ACs with a cap? I've seen people use podcast ACs from forever ago. It's why we just settled on no more than using 3 a year. Do your tradeable ACs count towards the 3 ACs per season limit? Are you only trading RCs from articles, or we using ones earned through posts too? Just gonna vote no on this. RCs trade able would only be from RTs imo but seems like a lot of work i agree |
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jan 31, 2021 11:04:53 GMT -8
Like is someone actually going to enforce "banking" RCs/ACs with a cap? I've seen people use podcast ACs from forever ago. It's why we just settled on no more than using 3 a year. Do your tradeable ACs count towards the 3 ACs per season limit? Are you only trading RCs from articles, or we using ones earned through posts too? Just gonna vote no on this. I think the limit should be a spend limit. Not a have limit? If that makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jan 31, 2021 11:06:27 GMT -8
Idk man I don’t write articles so i save my ACs for when I have players to AC so I don’t think we should have a limit on how many we have
|
|
Skillz
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 31,304
|
Post by Skillz on Jan 31, 2021 11:11:36 GMT -8
I think the scarcity makes RCs and ACs more valuable
Kinda like not having them in trades
|
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 11:12:33 GMT -8
I think the scarcity makes RCs and ACs more valuable Kinda like not having them in trades Imagine if you could trade them so many more trade options for you 🤯🤯 |
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 11:12:49 GMT -8
Idc either way. As long as you can only use 3 per season
|
|
Skillz
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 31,304
|
Post by Skillz on Jan 31, 2021 11:15:31 GMT -8
I think the scarcity makes RCs and ACs more valuable Kinda like not having them in trades Imagine if you could trade them so many more trade options for you 🤯🤯 I need the constraint! |
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jan 31, 2021 11:16:32 GMT -8
Imagine if you could trade them so many more trade options for you 🤯🤯 I need the constraint! For me it would be like Instead of okay trades close add a second. Hmm I need a little more can you add an RC? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 11:18:44 GMT -8
I have some very specific concerns about organization. I mean people cant track and post trades correctly as is. This complicates that more. True also are you still only allowed to use 3 ACs as well i think that should stay. That is the rule. You can earn as many as you want, but you can only spend 3 per year. Brian tracks that. I have no idea how that works tbh. Im guessing we'd need an earning camp too tho. I mean I cant have 1 GM creating 10 ACs a year and trading 7. That creates an unfair advantage. So maybe wed need a cap on trading. |
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 11:20:46 GMT -8
True also are you still only allowed to use 3 ACs as well i think that should stay. That is the rule. You can earn as many as you want, but you can only spend 3 per year. Brian tracks that. I have no idea how that works tbh. Im guessing we'd need an earning camp too tho. I mean I cant have 1 GM creating 10 ACs a year and trading 7. That creates an unfair advantage. So maybe wed need a cap on trading. Yeah that’s true to. A lot of stuff needs to be discussed |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 11:26:09 GMT -8
Ya, it wouldnt be a simple process. I think the thing Im worried about the most is the actual posting of the trade.
People dont take care in posting deals. This makes it more complex. I mean I cant even get you guys to post the draft picks correctly after 15 years
|
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jan 31, 2021 11:27:44 GMT -8
I say no to complicated
|
|
|
|
Post by Galo on Jan 31, 2021 11:38:22 GMT -8
Not opposed to it but need to be alot more detailed. Like a cap on how many RCs and ACs can be earned/traded etc
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 11:38:33 GMT -8
It probably will be complicated behind the scenes. But I think that can be handled.
Would it increase your enjoyment?
As a GM you just need to post the trade correctly.
|
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 11:39:26 GMT -8
It probably will be complicated behind the scenes. But I think that can be handled. Would it increase your enjoyment? As a GM you just need to post the trade correctly. Greeme not allowed to post trades |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 11:39:39 GMT -8
Not opposed to it but need to be alot more detailed. Like a cap on how many RCs and ACs can be earned/traded etc We have no cap on earning RCs. I think we need a cap on how many you can trade. 3? AC cap is 3 for spend per year. Maybe a cap of 3 to trade also? Id like it to be simple. SO either 2 for each or 3 for each. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 31, 2021 11:39:54 GMT -8
It probably will be complicated behind the scenes. But I think that can be handled. Would it increase your enjoyment? As a GM you just need to post the trade correctly. Greeme not allowed to post trades This should be a rule regardless. |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jan 31, 2021 12:01:31 GMT -8
its a no for me
|
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 31, 2021 12:02:47 GMT -8
No cuz I no good at writing so I’d be at an even bigger disadvantage with the pod boys and the writers
|
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 31, 2021 12:03:27 GMT -8
And it reminds me of whack Maniac
|
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 31, 2021 12:03:43 GMT -8
Fuck cockbeeeee
|
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jan 31, 2021 12:10:44 GMT -8
No cuz I no good at writing so I’d be at an even bigger disadvantage with the pod boys and the writers this would allow you to trade for ACs so you dont gotta write as devils advocate |
|
peRCy Buford
Wait List
Wait List
I would not have traded the Luka pick
Posts: 3,568
|
Post by peRCy Buford on Jan 31, 2021 12:11:20 GMT -8
|
|
JR
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 38,037
|
Post by JR on Jan 31, 2021 12:11:55 GMT -8
No cuz I no good at writing so I’d be at an even bigger disadvantage with the pod boys and the writers this would allow you to trade for ACs so you dont gotta write as devils advocate But he’s saying that the people who wrote will have an advantage because they can trade the articles and camp. I see both sides |
|
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65552195/tyler_parker_5_guys_kings.0.jpg)
