|
Post by jahallstar on May 26, 2020 8:20:19 GMT -8
someone with cap should be willing to give a first for pryz who has cap? Besides maybe the Rockets.
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:20:46 GMT -8
someone with cap should be willing to give a first for pryz Rockets have cap yet dumped him
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:21:05 GMT -8
Typical terrible move by ahsan
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:21:34 GMT -8
he's terrified that any slight improvement is gonna ruin his tank
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:21:47 GMT -8
He will be #1 projected I don't get why he had to dump talent
|
|
|
Post by kobe on May 26, 2020 8:22:16 GMT -8
lol yea he already has #1 locked up
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:22:34 GMT -8
Probably would have offered for 10M/3 years or some other small deal
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:22:51 GMT -8
But can't risk 12 wins instead of 10!!!
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:23:13 GMT -8
I wanted to build salary for a potential trade and offered him three 1 mil scrubs for 1 3 mil scrub and he said he didn't think spencer was gonna let him cut the people I trade to him (dana barros, gillam, and one other) and wanted to me sign VET FA's so he could cut them after the deal.
I said no thanks too much work for spencer.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:23:48 GMT -8
that was a particularly painful conversation
|
|
|
Post by Galo on May 26, 2020 8:24:13 GMT -8
That was cheap for Pryz. Some teams just giving players away.
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:24:14 GMT -8
He could finish .500 rest of the way and still be #1 projected easily
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:25:35 GMT -8
Until this iteration of the Rockets team I was sure FBB wouldn't allow a team to only win 10 games a season, but here we are.
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:25:57 GMT -8
Well I have seen a 1-81 team before
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:26:03 GMT -8
any amount of bird years under 3 doesn't matter right?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:26:17 GMT -8
Well I have seen a 1-81 team before that's amazing
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:26:24 GMT -8
any amount of bird years under 3 doesn't matter right? Yes
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:26:55 GMT -8
Well I have seen a 1-81 team before that's amazing Was impressive for sure, nobody has been able to pull it off since
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:27:20 GMT -8
If Ahsan dumped Marion he could make a run at it
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:27:23 GMT -8
this offseason was weird though. I don't know why only teams with cap got resigning offers because I know I've seen guys with under 3 bird years resign with teams that didnt have cap
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2020 8:27:59 GMT -8
Right foot up left foot slide
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:28:24 GMT -8
this offseason was weird though. I don't know why only teams with cap got resigning offers because I know I've seen guys with under 3 bird years resign with teams that didnt have cap Well that is not possible in FBB
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:28:28 GMT -8
If Ahsan dumped Marion he could make a run at it he should do that to guarantee himself a top 3 projected next year although I guess it's possible he has a good shot at it anyway.
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on May 26, 2020 8:28:35 GMT -8
Right foot up left foot slide oi
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2020 8:29:00 GMT -8
Left foot up right foot slide
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on May 26, 2020 8:29:03 GMT -8
it's been too long
|
|
|
Post by kobe on May 26, 2020 8:29:41 GMT -8
it just doesn't make sense to run resignings during the playoffs when teams will have cap in the offseason to resign players
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2020 8:30:11 GMT -8
Nike crossbody got a piece in it
|
|
|
Post by greeme on May 26, 2020 8:30:37 GMT -8
the frenzy seems to facilitate a few major moves and lots and lots of meaningless ones that only occur for the rc. up to spence to decide if it's worth the amount of work it generates. if we keep it, i think we could re-work the ratings parameters, including to count C+/A- scorers for the rc and to exclude deals where one team gives up a vet FA. don't mean to complicate it, but most of the deals that occurred were silly. new rule - both sides most have at least one player traded with one of the following 1 - 2b+ ratings not including pot 2 - 2 b ratings on rook contract 3 - any big with b b+ d/rebounding or vice versa 4- scoring ratings of b/b+, b-/a-, c+/a or vice versa. or a player that averaged 18 ppg in the year before or up to the frenzy if they played at least half the games 5 - any 1st rounder unprotected or protected that turns into an unprotected first rounder a player traded more than once will only count in the first trade
|
|
|
Post by Stevie B on May 26, 2020 8:31:18 GMT -8
Well I have seen a 1-81 team before that's amazing
|
|