|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:48:57 GMT -8
1 more for this RT im sending
|
|
|
Post by Stevie B on Jul 1, 2022 8:49:23 GMT -8
There were way too many teams with cap this FA to even think about taking a chance on that
Especially when he had Baylor, Walton, Wah Wah, etc. hitting the open market
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Jul 1, 2022 8:49:33 GMT -8
Yeah the impression I got from lums earlier was that he wasn't maxing Naulls well no shit He declined said max re-signing offer, lol I didn't notice he offered to resign tbh
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jul 1, 2022 8:50:25 GMT -8
Not sure why consensus is Naulls is an automatic max. You must be making the assumption that he has something in the tank potential wise, or his scoring output was diminished in a major way by Baylor, Walton, Lovelette. The latter makes some sense, but it is risky. Development has been very stagnant in 4 years, even with a pot boost. Rebounds are above average. Stocks are not ideal for what GM's really desire these days. There is nothing convincing me that he is going to be a big time defensive/shot blocker or an option on a championship team maybe outside the Warriors. It's ironic, because people were really low on Naulls several years ago when I acquired him, he hasn't improved at all and now we are pitchforks and torches at Lums door for not offering the max. They were very low on Naulls because you traded a 35 ppg sf for him.
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jul 1, 2022 8:50:42 GMT -8
1 more for this RT im sending Mvp
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:50:47 GMT -8
even if willie isnt worth a max you pay him the max bc him on your team is more valuable then losing him for nothing. its really that simple.
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:51:19 GMT -8
@sargo making you join this RT
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jul 1, 2022 8:51:32 GMT -8
Like I said you could of got 2 picks at the very minimum for Naulls.
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:51:32 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:51:54 GMT -8
also if there was even a slight chance of losing baylor why lose both
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:52:00 GMT -8
or risk it rather
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 8:53:11 GMT -8
Like I said you could of got 2 picks at the very minimum for Naulls. what about the three picks Matt Forfeited
|
|
ashes
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 36,162
|
Post by ashes on Jul 1, 2022 8:53:17 GMT -8
Whatever
|
|
|
Post by DeeperThanSims on Jul 1, 2022 8:53:38 GMT -8
Not sure why consensus is Naulls is an automatic max. You must be making the assumption that he has something in the tank potential wise, or his scoring output was diminished in a major way by Baylor, Walton, Lovelette. The latter makes some sense, but it is risky. Development has been very stagnant in 4 years, even with a pot boost. Rebounds are above average. Stocks are not ideal for what GM's really desire these days. There is nothing convincing me that he is going to be a big time defensive/shot blocker or an option on a championship team maybe outside the Warriors. It's ironic, because people were really low on Naulls several years ago when I acquired him, he hasn't improved at all and now we are pitchforks and torches at Lums door for not offering the max. Even if this is true, GMs set the value. HF wasn't the only guy with cap who maxed him. Sign him and get something. That was our collective point.
|
|
|
Post by the original michael on Jul 1, 2022 8:53:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:54:37 GMT -8
i maxed willie
|
|
|
Post by Galo on Jul 1, 2022 8:54:52 GMT -8
we all lie to ourselves sometimes
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 8:54:55 GMT -8
Im lame and did not
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:54:59 GMT -8
but he told me piss off Braz
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 8:55:27 GMT -8
you are very conservative for someone spending fictional $
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 8:55:51 GMT -8
you are very conservative for someone spending fictional $ I really like flexibility.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 8:56:34 GMT -8
looking forward to maxing Jim Krebs next offseason
|
|
|
Post by hf on Jul 1, 2022 8:57:40 GMT -8
I have max cap next offseason
|
|
Von
Wait List
Ex-GM
Posts: 15,257
|
Post by Von on Jul 1, 2022 8:58:16 GMT -8
Not sure why consensus is Naulls is an automatic max. You must be making the assumption that he has something in the tank potential wise, or his scoring output was diminished in a major way by Baylor, Walton, Lovelette. The latter makes some sense, but it is risky. Development has been very stagnant in 4 years, even with a pot boost. Rebounds are above average. Stocks are not ideal for what GM's really desire these days. There is nothing convincing me that he is going to be a big time defensive/shot blocker or an option on a championship team maybe outside the Warriors. It's ironic, because people were really low on Naulls several years ago when I acquired him, he hasn't improved at all and now we are pitchforks and torches at Lums door for not offering the max. Even if this is true, GMs set the value. HF wasn't the only guy with cap who maxed him. Sign him and get something. That was our collective point. Just because GM's set the FA value doesn't mean you should follow suit if it doesn't make sense. Smart money is key. I have yet to see a case on why Naulls deserves a max from a production or potential standpoint.
|
|
|
Post by 2 years left on Jul 1, 2022 8:58:42 GMT -8
I don’t need more cap I’m not GREEDY
|
|
ashes
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 36,162
|
Post by ashes on Jul 1, 2022 9:00:01 GMT -8
Guess I’m maxing fucking Tom Gola
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 9:00:22 GMT -8
Guess I’m maxing fucking Tom Gola oh no
|
|
ashes
Wait List
Wait List
Posts: 36,162
|
Post by ashes on Jul 1, 2022 9:01:00 GMT -8
Sending one year maxes to everyone’s key leftover FAs
|
|
|
Post by Braz on Jul 1, 2022 9:01:16 GMT -8
looking forward to maxing Jim Krebs next offseason well he will be getting a max from me! Good luck
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jul 1, 2022 9:01:25 GMT -8
Sending one year maxes to everyone’s key leftover FAs hey so am I
|
|